Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="longtimefan" data-source="post: 525705" data-attributes="member: 145">Matt wasnt coming here...Again, here is the article stating that...<a href="http://www.jsonline.com/sports/matt-hasselbeck-believes-seneca-wallace-will-improve-b99137819z1-231098671.html" target="_blank">http://www.jsonline.com/sports/matt-hasselbeck-believes-seneca-wallace-will-improve-b99137819z1-231098671.html</a>You really still havent answered my main question...Neither has @[USER=1568]Sunshine885500[/USER] Josh was a loser up until this year..Why wouldnt have Wallace turned out okay with MM instructing him? Lord knows he has to be better any q/b coach the Bears have.<a href="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/319898-seneca-wallace-or-matt-hasselbeck" target="_blank">http://bleacherreport.com/articles/319898-seneca-wallace-or-matt-hasselbeck</a>     article  from 2010We heard at least 2 out of 3 of those same issues..    Last part I have said more than once..New OC and right players around him..I just cant understand why people harp on Wallace being a loser of completion % is low.. Those are the SAME issues Josh Mcknown had before this year..And now he is 4-0 or 5-0 this year.</blockquote>

Total: 459 (members: 3, guests: 456)