Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jess" data-source="post: 251906" data-attributes="member: 1495">I think the talent level of those teams compared to the current Vikings is closer than you'd think. I'll take Peterson over Levens. I'll take the Vikes D-line over Reggie, Gilbert, Dotson, and Sean Jones. Yes, I just said that. The numbers say the Vikings rush defense is the best in history. And it's because of their line play with the Williams Wall and Allen. Add in the fact that Allen is playing like a white Reggie this year and it's at the very least a wash. The mid-90's Packes had a better secondary though, with Butler, Evans, Newsome/Williams, and Eugene/Teague. Also they have a better receiver core with Freeman, Brooks, and Rison/Mickens/Schroeder. I don't think Berrian, Harvin, and Rice are at that level...yet. Harvin is going to be very good though, and Rice is finding his groove lately. I don't know enough about the mid-90's O-line to make a judgement there, but I know the Vikings have a damn good one right now. Like it or not Packer fans, this Vikings team is Super Bowl caliber.</blockquote>

Total: 595 (members: 2, guests: 593)