Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 775032">That.There are 4 guys, we assume, competing for 3 nickel "starter" spots.  There will be months figuring out the best configurations.  The brass probably has a preliminary idea where they slot  these guys but at the same time I'm sure they view it as an exploratory process.King's probably only suitable for the perimeter.  I could see the other 3 playing slot or outside.  Lets see what happens in preaseason.  Somebody's going to end up relegated to dime corner.  However, the value of being 4 deep can't be underestimated since you cannot expect starters to go 48 for 48 in starts.  Guys will miss games; depth at the position is critical.  A weak link at corner gets preyed upon.  House sits at #5, but isn't he part of the problem that this draft is intending to solve?I recall making the same observation regarding depth at WR depth aroud this time in 2015.  Among 3 WRs, 6 missed starts was my reasonable conjecture.   Then Nelson blew his ACL and the scramble was on resulting in James Jones.  Speaking of which, they better get a WR soon in this draft.</blockquote>

Total: 856 (members: 2, guests: 854)