Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Thing to remember about WRs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackinMSP" data-source="post: 873961" data-attributes="member: 13351"><p>I'm not ENTIRELY disagreeing here but the argument is for the guys AFTER the top 6...</p><p></p><p>Would they really be that much better than Lazard or Funchess?? THIS year I mean.</p><p></p><p>I think if you're evaluating talent/potential...than I 110% agree with you, we DEFINITELY SHOULD HAVE gotten any WR at that spot</p><p></p><p>But let's look at Production:</p><p></p><p>Lazard "played" in 16 games, but he really only saw time at WR in 11:</p><p></p><p>So in 11 games:</p><p>35/477/3</p><p></p><p>16 game projection:</p><p>51/694/4</p><p></p><p></p><p>So essentially about Renfrow or Deonte...</p><p></p><p>Do i think those guys may have more talent/higher ceiling than Lazard? Probably...but we will have to see</p><p></p><p>I think the FO is just seeing that as a way to measure Production</p><p></p><p>The TOP 4/5 WRs, where we were no longer in position to draft, would ABSOUTELY have been more productive IMHO</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackinMSP, post: 873961, member: 13351"] I'm not ENTIRELY disagreeing here but the argument is for the guys AFTER the top 6... Would they really be that much better than Lazard or Funchess?? THIS year I mean. I think if you're evaluating talent/potential...than I 110% agree with you, we DEFINITELY SHOULD HAVE gotten any WR at that spot But let's look at Production: Lazard "played" in 16 games, but he really only saw time at WR in 11: So in 11 games: 35/477/3 16 game projection: 51/694/4 So essentially about Renfrow or Deonte... Do i think those guys may have more talent/higher ceiling than Lazard? Probably...but we will have to see I think the FO is just seeing that as a way to measure Production The TOP 4/5 WRs, where we were no longer in position to draft, would ABSOUTELY have been more productive IMHO [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
scheeler
PackerinSD
DoURant
David Ciembronowicz
Team Ronny
Emur
Pkrjones
Green_Bay_Packers
Latest posts
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: DoURant
A moment ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
D
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: David Ciembronowicz
1 minute ago
Draft Talk
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: DoURant
31 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:20 AM
Draft Talk
H
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 8:05 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Thing to remember about WRs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top