Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Thing to remember about WRs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackAttack12" data-source="post: 873872" data-attributes="member: 11933"><p>I’m disappointed with not taking a WR but I’m more disappointed that you invested a 1st and a 4th on a player you don’t want to see take the field for bare minimum the next 2-3 years. </p><p></p><p>Gute is placing a lot of faith into what we currently have. Could it work out? We already have Davante, Lazard proved to be serviceable, but how high is his ceiling? Funchess is proven, but missed the entire season last year. EQ is a prospect I’m high on, but missed the entire season last year. MVS has a ton of improvement to make before he can be relied upon. </p><p></p><p>So if Lazard gets better, if Funchess comes back strong, if EQ is ready to play a big role after not seeing the field in MLF’s first year, if MVS makes all kinds of improvement, then yeah we might be okay. But I don’t want to have to rely upon that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackAttack12, post: 873872, member: 11933"] I’m disappointed with not taking a WR but I’m more disappointed that you invested a 1st and a 4th on a player you don’t want to see take the field for bare minimum the next 2-3 years. Gute is placing a lot of faith into what we currently have. Could it work out? We already have Davante, Lazard proved to be serviceable, but how high is his ceiling? Funchess is proven, but missed the entire season last year. EQ is a prospect I’m high on, but missed the entire season last year. MVS has a ton of improvement to make before he can be relied upon. So if Lazard gets better, if Funchess comes back strong, if EQ is ready to play a big role after not seeing the field in MLF’s first year, if MVS makes all kinds of improvement, then yeah we might be okay. But I don’t want to have to rely upon that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 8:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 6:14 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 5:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 3:06 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: mradtke66
Yesterday at 2:30 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Thing to remember about WRs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top