Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="texaspackerbacker" data-source="post: 500541" data-attributes="member: 25"><p>The argument above seems to be more just a misunderstanding. I think what Dan correctly is pointing out, the A Number 1 MOST important piece of the puzzle is Aaron Rodgers - without him, not much good is gonna happen. However, the article and you other guys got it right too, as great as Rodgers is, we came up short last year with too weak a supporting cast. For the Packers to be a LOT better, the O Line needs a lot of improvement - Bulaga, as somebody said, Sherrod - I wish but kinda doubt, the side to side switch, etc. Having time for Rodgers to set up, having a running game to take the pressure off a little bit, etc. will help immensely. It's hard to say how much having better runners will make the line seem better, but one way or the other, it has to get better. As for all the defensive elements mentioned in the article, for sure, all or even some of them performing up to expectations will help extremely, but let's not forget, we won a Super Bowl with a far less than perfect defense, and we went 15-1 the next regular season with an almost pathetic defense. I guess my point is that having all the players come through in the article plus decent O Line play, all supporting Aaron Rodgers would go way beyond just the minimum needed to return to a Super Bowl. It would make the Packers unstoppable.</p></blockquote><p></p>

No members online now.

Total: 971 (members: 1, guests: 970)