Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The veteran fa rbs vs rookie rbs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="armand34" data-source="post: 720993" data-attributes="member: 2251"><p>My comment has nothing to do with New England's or Belicheat's drafting prowess. I'm pointing out that they handle distraction-type players extremely well and it never appears to factor negatively towards their success. Marty-Saurus Rex, Chad Johnson, Blount, Moss, Brandon Spikes weren't known to be great locker room players.</p><p></p><p>Going back to the original topic, we don't require a 3-down back, although it would be nice, Blount supplies what the Packers do not have. A big physical presence that can get the short yardage. If we don't land a rookie RB capable of 15+ snaps a game for 1st & 2nd down. Then Blount would be a priority (IMO) @ 6' 250 lbs, he could work well and the Packers could easily afford his services.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="armand34, post: 720993, member: 2251"] My comment has nothing to do with New England's or Belicheat's drafting prowess. I'm pointing out that they handle distraction-type players extremely well and it never appears to factor negatively towards their success. Marty-Saurus Rex, Chad Johnson, Blount, Moss, Brandon Spikes weren't known to be great locker room players. Going back to the original topic, we don't require a 3-down back, although it would be nice, Blount supplies what the Packers do not have. A big physical presence that can get the short yardage. If we don't land a rookie RB capable of 15+ snaps a game for 1st & 2nd down. Then Blount would be a priority (IMO) @ 6' 250 lbs, he could work well and the Packers could easily afford his services. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 12:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 11:57 AM
Movies and Entertainment
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 11:08 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:07 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:43 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The veteran fa rbs vs rookie rbs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top