Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GreenBaySlacker" data-source="post: 720617" data-attributes="member: 9780">I read about the raiders saying to Lynch , that he needs to be traded before the draft... the rb position is one that a rookie can step in and be pretty good from day one. And also the current trend that rbs are just not that important... even a couple beastly hall of famers can't get a big offer.Leverage would shift from Oakland to Seattle and Lynch, if the draft were to come and go, and the raiders don't draft a replacement for latvius Murray... raiders have to draft a rb...This is a deep rb draft, I'm told. And it's a guarantee Ted will add a few 7 th rd and undrafted rbs to fill the ranks. We also have Montgomery/Michael to fall back on... say we don't draft a rb early to snag a starter quality rb???Then all of a sudden Peterson, Lynch are both back in play. Assuming the teams that really needs a rb end up drafting a good one.What would you all rather have? A solid rookie to add to Monty/Michael combo? 4 years of cheap salary... or a short term stud like all day, or beast mode to give us a solid rotation and depth. Maybe even gain a elite player? Giving us time to test Montgomery's durability</blockquote>

Total: 230 (members: 1, guests: 229)