Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 876658" data-attributes="member: 10086">Once again myself and many in here probably would’ve waited 1-2 years at QB. But our hopes and aspirations are all just water under the bridge now.Where we do benefit is in dramatically increasing our odds in a contingency situation all the while giving Love time to develop.   While many 1st year starting QBs are pushed into starting duty day 1, Love has the luxury of learning the ropes in a Masters Class of QB schools.In the meantime, does anyone think we will consider using Love selectively as a utility player, similar to how the Saints have supplemented Brees now that he’s in his twilight tears?  I say that because Love is pretty athletic and he’s been effective scrambling. I could see us using a more versatile athlete in Love under Center as a speed change up, it also corresponds with how we seem to be leaning drafting  better run blockers, along with a 250lb. halfback.  That would also appease a disgruntled fan base who hadn’t considered they may use him in certain packages, starting later this season. It’s not something we’re accustomed to in GB, but thats exactly the point.. neither is our opponent.</blockquote>

Total: 311 (members: 4, guests: 307)