Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Heyjoe4" data-source="post: 876349" data-attributes="member: 13032">Both you and Ty make excellent and really complimentary arguments.  I agree with both of you.Personally I wanted Tee Higgins at #30.  That’s arguable.  What I don’t think is arguable is that the majority of contributors here would have been elated with a WR at #30 (Higgins was selected with the first pick in the 2d round, for what that’s worth), or ILB Queen.I think the reality is what 75 implies - that come hell or high water Gluten wanted Love in rd 1, NOT a WR (or other position of need like ILB or OT).As is always the case, history will be the judge of this draft.  And in closing, I reinforce 75’s point about BPA.  No team picks BPA unless it coincides with need.  In other words, need almost always trumps BPA.  Just my opinion.At any rate you have both made excellent and thought provoking points, so thanks!</blockquote>

Total: 675 (members: 1, guests: 674)