Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Point of the Draft Picks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 875594" data-attributes="member: 6578"><p>I agree with you 100% and I also believe that IF Gute & Co. was as high on Edwards as I was he would have picked him. I watched a lot of his tape, but I guarantee you they watched more..noticed more and knew more. Now I had Edwards circled as a mid-3rd rounder so perhaps they did like him, but clearly had Dillon weight strongly enough over him to not "reach" (hate that term to a degree).</p><p></p><p>Now if at #64 you had Edwards/Van Jefferson/Claypool and say Hamler all setting there and we didn't pick one I'd have maybe argued issue more over it - because I just would have found it tougher to believe none were rated high enough on their board to take....but you cannot expect a team to like the players you do, and I trust that they just weren't as high on Edwards or at least not enough to say let's pick him this far ahead of where our board shows him.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tynimiller, post: 875594, member: 6578"] I agree with you 100% and I also believe that IF Gute & Co. was as high on Edwards as I was he would have picked him. I watched a lot of his tape, but I guarantee you they watched more..noticed more and knew more. Now I had Edwards circled as a mid-3rd rounder so perhaps they did like him, but clearly had Dillon weight strongly enough over him to not "reach" (hate that term to a degree). Now if at #64 you had Edwards/Van Jefferson/Claypool and say Hamler all setting there and we didn't pick one I'd have maybe argued issue more over it - because I just would have found it tougher to believe none were rated high enough on their board to take....but you cannot expect a team to like the players you do, and I trust that they just weren't as high on Edwards or at least not enough to say let's pick him this far ahead of where our board shows him. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
tynimiller
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
10 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:10 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
M
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: mradtke66
Today at 9:57 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Today at 9:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
Today at 9:39 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Point of the Draft Picks
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top