Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 875555" data-attributes="member: 7261">I am guessing that some of those fans will monitor the 31 WR's that were taken after the Packers selected Love, pick out the ones who have the best season and come back here and post that Gute was an idiot for not selecting them instead of Love.  Will that one player be the missing link to a Super Bowl?  I doubt it.  Who has the potential to make the biggest impact from this draft class?  I would have to say Love.  Had they instead taken one of the WR's that other teams took in Round 2, many of us probably would have cheered.  However, that doesn't guarantee anything as to how that WR will perform, nor does it do anything to answer the question of "Who replaces Rodgers eventually?"As someone who didn't have as much confidence as some seemed to have in a rookie WR making an immediate impact, I was at least hopeful that Gute would still be able to land one for the future. However, given the position he was at on the board (end of each round) and the way the draft played out, without a trade, he would have had to go Round 1 or Round 2 to probably grab such a prospect.  With that in mind, people here talk a lot about BPA, why is it so hard to understand that in both of those rounds, the Packers saw better options than a WR on their board?</blockquote>

Total: 546 (members: 2, guests: 544)