Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Point of the Draft Picks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 875520"><p>I don't believe for a second that there wasn't a wide receiver available who would have been an upgrade over MVS, EQ, Kumerow and all the others currently on the roster behind Adams, Funchess and possibly Lazard.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You didn't agree that the Packers offense lacked talent compared to other teams though.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Taking a look at the current depth chart at wide receiver there's no way Gutekunst makes me buy into the theory that there wasn't a single one available at any point in this year's draft offering an upgrade at the position.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Even if that's true it would have been smarter to reach for a wide receiver at #30 than to trade up for a quarterback.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's mind-boggling that fans who were raving about the talent level of the draft class at wide receiver before this year's draft now are adamant about there not being a single one available at the end of the second round who would have been able to upgrade the Packers unit.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't think the Packers need to have two 1,000 yards receivers this season but need better production out of the group as a whole.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 875520"] I don't believe for a second that there wasn't a wide receiver available who would have been an upgrade over MVS, EQ, Kumerow and all the others currently on the roster behind Adams, Funchess and possibly Lazard. You didn't agree that the Packers offense lacked talent compared to other teams though. Taking a look at the current depth chart at wide receiver there's no way Gutekunst makes me buy into the theory that there wasn't a single one available at any point in this year's draft offering an upgrade at the position. Even if that's true it would have been smarter to reach for a wide receiver at #30 than to trade up for a quarterback. It's mind-boggling that fans who were raving about the talent level of the draft class at wide receiver before this year's draft now are adamant about there not being a single one available at the end of the second round who would have been able to upgrade the Packers unit. I don't think the Packers need to have two 1,000 yards receivers this season but need better production out of the group as a whole. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
Latest posts
UDFA Signings 2025
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
14 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Final Thoughts on 2025 Draft
Latest: OldSchool101
44 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Pick 198 Warren Brinson DT Georgia
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 3:34 PM
Draft Talk
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 3:02 PM
College Sports
2025 NFL Schedule Release
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 2:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Point of the Draft Picks
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top