Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 1000537">Wait a moment? You're telling me the Packers were well aware that Rodgers was still capable of performing at an MVP level at the time of the 2020 draft? The only reason justifying the selection of Love that has been mentioned is that the team thought he was in decline.If your take is true it was even more stupid to trade up for Love three years back.I strongly disagree. First of all Eason won only a total of 28 games during his NFL career. While he had two decent seasons in 1984 and '86 he was hardly the reason the Patriots made it to the Super Bowl in '85. During the regular season he ranked only 22nd out of 29 qualifying quarterbacks in passer rating. In the playoffs New England relied heavily on running the football (147 rushing attempts to only 43 throws - running the ball on a whopping 77.4% of their offensive plays) in the first three games to advance to the Super Bowl. Therefore the notion Eason took them to the big game isn't true either.Overall, he definitely doesn't strike me as a franchise quarterback.</blockquote>

Total: 114 (members: 1, guests: 113)