Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Free Agency Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 778998"><p>You're right. Given the large discrepancy in the Cleveland example, my earlier certainty is rendered null and void. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/eek.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":eek:" title="Eek! :eek:" data-shortname=":eek:" /></p><p></p><p>That takes us back to your earlier statement, "I'm all but convinced that the team cap on the NFLPA's website is the current amount the Packers have allocated towards the cap (top 51 contracts plus dead money)." That accounts for fewer and smaller discrepancies.</p><p></p><p>In the Cleveland eaxmple that $169 mil cap hit syncs up pretty close with spotracs $168 mil while overthecap is lagging at $157 mil.</p><p></p><p>That takes us to the oddity you identified: "Both the NFLPA and Spotrac have similar numbers for the Packers current team cap but for some [reason] I'm not capable of figuring out [why] the players union website lists the team with an additional $3.4 million cap space."</p><p></p><p>I can't account for that $3.4 mil discrepancey either, after trying once and failing <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/sleep.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":sleep:" title="Sleep :sleep:" data-shortname=":sleep:" />, but I'll offer a last conjecture. A few years back I vaguely recall reading about team-specific "cap adjustments" in addition to carryover, though I cannot remember the causes nor find an old or current source discussing them. This link <a href="https://russellstreetreport.com/salarycap/nfl-salary-cap-faqs/mentions" target="_blank">https://russellstreetreport.com/salarycap/nfl-salary-cap-faqs/mentions</a> "net incentive adjustments" but does not go on to explain them. It kinda sounds like unlikely to be earned incentives being earned which which drive the cap space down. Or in this case perhaps game day roster bonuses likely to be earned but which are not earned due to injury get added back into the cap after the carryover amount is set. Or some of both plusses and minuses netted out as the phrase suggests.</p><p></p><p>If you look at overthecap's top 51 + dead cap + remaining cap space, they've applied some upward cap adjustment in addition to carryover that narrows the $3.5 mil discrepancy to about $1 mil. And once they get around to posting the recent two FA signings, the avilable cap space should get close to the NFLPA number. overthecap, on balance, syncs better than spotrac with the NFLPA numbers though slower posting individual contracts.</p><p>tow</p><p>That exhuasts my thinking on the matter without additional info. For now, +/- $10.5 mil current cap space seems as good a number as any; it's the NFLPA number and overthecap comes close with expected updates. One would hope the various sources adjust toward closer agreement, though I can't say I expect it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 778998"] You're right. Given the large discrepancy in the Cleveland example, my earlier certainty is rendered null and void. :eek: That takes us back to your earlier statement, "I'm all but convinced that the team cap on the NFLPA's website is the current amount the Packers have allocated towards the cap (top 51 contracts plus dead money)." That accounts for fewer and smaller discrepancies. In the Cleveland eaxmple that $169 mil cap hit syncs up pretty close with spotracs $168 mil while overthecap is lagging at $157 mil. That takes us to the oddity you identified: "Both the NFLPA and Spotrac have similar numbers for the Packers current team cap but for some [reason] I'm not capable of figuring out [why] the players union website lists the team with an additional $3.4 million cap space." I can't account for that $3.4 mil discrepancey either, after trying once and failing :sleep:, but I'll offer a last conjecture. A few years back I vaguely recall reading about team-specific "cap adjustments" in addition to carryover, though I cannot remember the causes nor find an old or current source discussing them. This link [URL]https://russellstreetreport.com/salarycap/nfl-salary-cap-faqs/mentions[/URL] "net incentive adjustments" but does not go on to explain them. It kinda sounds like unlikely to be earned incentives being earned which which drive the cap space down. Or in this case perhaps game day roster bonuses likely to be earned but which are not earned due to injury get added back into the cap after the carryover amount is set. Or some of both plusses and minuses netted out as the phrase suggests. If you look at overthecap's top 51 + dead cap + remaining cap space, they've applied some upward cap adjustment in addition to carryover that narrows the $3.5 mil discrepancy to about $1 mil. And once they get around to posting the recent two FA signings, the avilable cap space should get close to the NFLPA number. overthecap, on balance, syncs better than spotrac with the NFLPA numbers though slower posting individual contracts. tow That exhuasts my thinking on the matter without additional info. For now, +/- $10.5 mil current cap space seems as good a number as any; it's the NFLPA number and overthecap comes close with expected updates. One would hope the various sources adjust toward closer agreement, though I can't say I expect it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Yesterday at 11:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 9:27 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 8:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 6:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Free Agency Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top