Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 771149" data-attributes="member: 9033">You're right, the Eagles had an offensive coach who actually worked with the players on the team and created a great offense out of what was there. The Packers, right now, have better wide receivers than the Eagles did. So I'd call that a wash, since Ty is just as good a receiver out of the backfield as anyone. SO, in answer to your question, yes, I would EASILY believe the Packers offense is up to that task with Rodgers, Graham, Adams, Cobb, Ty, and Williams. If that offense isn't top-5 or above in the NFL with those as the main pieces, then the offensive staff needs to be fired because they're incompetent.As for concerns over the offense the past couple of seasons, that's on the QB getting hurt, our "QB guru" coach not actually developing anyone, and the lack of imagination in offensive scheme. The Packers, last season, were basically the most predictable offense in the NFL; they trotted out 3/1 sets at a higher rate than any other team DESPITE starting a backup QB that might have benefited from some variety. There's a reason that MM decided to go back to square one on the offensive playbook, it's because it's old and outdated.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 488 (members: 0, guests: 488)