Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 771065" data-attributes="member: 7261">The Eagles also had 3 RB's that combined for 1500 yards rushing and almost 250 yds of receiving.  They also had 3 WR's combine for almost 200o yds, add that to Ertz's 824 yds and I have to wonder if you are still as confident that the Packer offense will be equal to that task?For me, the concern is what we have seen during various points of the last 3-4 seasons.  One of the starting wide receivers of Nelson, Cobb or Adams goes down and the guys coming in are a pretty big drop off.  Well here we are today, Nelson is gone and those "other" guys are all pretty much the same, so who is coming in?  Even worse, if Adams or Cobb go down, who else is coming in?  While I understand people's confidence in the offense and a 3rd WR will be "made", I can't help but look back at what has happened to the Packer offense in the past when one or more of those starting 3 aren't on the field.I know some of you want to use Graham in the discussion as the 3rd WR, but who is the #1 TE than picking up those stats?  Cook and Richard Rodgers combined for 650 yards in 2016.</blockquote>

Total: 965 (members: 1, guests: 964)