Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 950856" data-attributes="member: 7261">The problem is, most of what the Packers are doing hinges on Rodgers decision.  From what I understand from Tom Silverstein, all of their negotiations with other players are on hold, until Rodgers gives them his decision.  This puts the Packers in a really crappy position IMO.  I doubt they shove all in if Rodgers tells them he is retiring or wants out of Green Bay.  So you have players like Douglas, Campbell, MVS, Lazard, etc. being told "we will get back to you when the big cheese tells us his plans."The fact that Rodgers is doing this to the organization is really worse than what Favre did with all his retirement waffling.  At least with Favre, you knew he wasn't questioning being a Packer.There is no doubt that the Packers are a better team in the short run with Rodgers, but I am still not sure about the long run.  I would be shocked if he retires.  If he drags this out much longer, I would be fine with the Packers just trading him to the highest bidder and if it means making it conditional on him not retiring, so be it.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 933 (members: 0, guests: 933)