Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="net" data-source="post: 166782" data-attributes="member: 200">The Press-Gazette allows readers to comment on stories. Each day, it inevitably ends with the "Good Ted" vs. "Bad Ted" debate. I'm no fan of Ted's, as you know, but I posted this below. It's a bit like yacht design. You can argue the merits of this or that, but once the race begins, GRAB A LINE!--------------Reading the comments above you would swear the Packers lost the game against Philly. Hey folks...the team is ahead of the Bears! I'm one of the original members of a fire Ted Thompson website, so I'm no fan of Ted's, but I've come to the realization that regardless of what decisions have been made it's time to suck it up and go with it. Quite honestly, I like the idea of a defensive-oriented team with good special teams. That took the Bears to the Super Bowl last year. It's been a long time since great defense was played here and you can't be a winner for long without it. For all of you fixated on eye-popping offensive numbers consider this: You can win the Super Bowl and never score a touchdown all season. In theory, if your defense doesn't allow a point, all you need is a safety or a field goal to win the game. The goal is to win the game, not run up your fantasy numbers. So if the Packers defense keeps the team in the game, the Packers have a chance to win ugly. An ugly win in the Super Bowl is still a championship!</blockquote>

Total: 1,000 (members: 4, guests: 996)