Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Bright Side Of Things
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 911102" data-attributes="member: 4199"><p>Perhaps, but that next 10-25% is potentially the most difficult thing to achieve in roster building. Law of diminishing returns and all that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's not doomed, but nor is future success assured. A great quarterback is the single most impactful person on the roster. Life after Rodgers is on a spectrum. Maybe Love is a HOF player. Maybe he's the new Dalton line. Maybe he's the first in a long quarterbacks that we churn through over the next 20 years as we do our best Browns impression. The most likely, from a pure numbers point of view, is our next quarterback is average or worse, as the league mostly has average or worse quarterbacks in it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Never said they should have</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You're trying to argue a few different points here and it's all over the map. You're trying to argue 2 or 3 different points in your reply and I'm really trying to get your thesis. All I can really grok is that you're angry and feel like yelling.</p><p></p><p>Yes, with Rodgers being in his late 30s, his time with us is short. Never stated otherwise. I DID anticipate a down year 1 with a year 2 improvement with MLF. There is historical evidence for this, most recently with Matt Ryan and the Shannahan Offense. Year 1 -> Year 2 was a huge improvement.</p><p></p><p>Yes, the Shannahan/MLF offense might keep us from bottoming out, but again the safe bet is Rodger's successor will be a significant downgrade. Hell, even though we would have been wrong, the safe bet was that Rodgers was going to be a significant downgrade to Favre.</p><p></p><p>If anything, if he (Love or whoever replaces Love) is just good enough for us to hover around .500, we probably <strong>are</strong> doomed. We're unlikely to suck bad enough to get that high pick to put us back in the driver seat....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mradtke66, post: 911102, member: 4199"] Perhaps, but that next 10-25% is potentially the most difficult thing to achieve in roster building. Law of diminishing returns and all that. It's not doomed, but nor is future success assured. A great quarterback is the single most impactful person on the roster. Life after Rodgers is on a spectrum. Maybe Love is a HOF player. Maybe he's the new Dalton line. Maybe he's the first in a long quarterbacks that we churn through over the next 20 years as we do our best Browns impression. The most likely, from a pure numbers point of view, is our next quarterback is average or worse, as the league mostly has average or worse quarterbacks in it. Never said they should have You're trying to argue a few different points here and it's all over the map. You're trying to argue 2 or 3 different points in your reply and I'm really trying to get your thesis. All I can really grok is that you're angry and feel like yelling. Yes, with Rodgers being in his late 30s, his time with us is short. Never stated otherwise. I DID anticipate a down year 1 with a year 2 improvement with MLF. There is historical evidence for this, most recently with Matt Ryan and the Shannahan Offense. Year 1 -> Year 2 was a huge improvement. Yes, the Shannahan/MLF offense might keep us from bottoming out, but again the safe bet is Rodger's successor will be a significant downgrade. Hell, even though we would have been wrong, the safe bet was that Rodgers was going to be a significant downgrade to Favre. If anything, if he (Love or whoever replaces Love) is just good enough for us to hover around .500, we probably [B]are[/B] doomed. We're unlikely to suck bad enough to get that high pick to put us back in the driver seat.... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Today at 12:09 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 4:49 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
F
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Firethorn1001
Yesterday at 1:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 11:53 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Bright Side Of Things
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
