Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Heyjoe4" data-source="post: 948829" data-attributes="member: 13032">I agree - I'd rather keep Rodgers as long as he's playing at this level.  That probably means signing Adams as well (he wouldn't take kindly to being tagged for a year and losing around $5 mil).  But then what?  Does it mean gutting a defense that is approaching elite play?  I don't know the answer.  In spite of his shortcomings in the playoffs, I feel a lot better about winning games with Rodgers, Adams, Jones, Dillon and the OL.That's just how I feel. It would make more sense to trade Rodgers and at the same time tag and trade Adams and get some draft capital and maybe a player or two.  Elite Ds can win games.  I think this is how it will play out.  I just don't like thinking about a team without Rodgers.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 88 (members: 0, guests: 88)