Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Bad & The Ugly of the 2010 Packers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 289482" data-attributes="member: 1429"><p>ST: Browns were #1 ST last year, we #31. It was supposed to struggle. Add the fact that we didn't use a cohesive ST unit, rather we put every 80-man player out there... The coaches weren't trying to get production out of ST, rather see which guys played well.</p><p></p><p>DL: really not a problem. The 3 you mentioned are very good, and Neal was VERY good in that game. He looks like a beast.</p><p></p><p>Pass D: The problem was that the DBs were giving too much cushion to the receivers. Commenters at cheeseheadtv.com made some very good points:</p><p>1) Tackling. The Packers have been stressing tackling this offseason. Playing with a cushion could be a way to test that.</p><p>2) Communication. They could be playing like this so that Burnett gets more time to get used to calling plays.</p><p>3) Injuries. They also could be playing off the receivers to lessen the risk of injuries.</p><p>Now, they played the same way last year, and it drove me mad. But IMHO you have to consider those possibilities before jumping to any conclusions.</p><p></p><p>About the short yardage: <a href="http://cheeseheadtv.com/lounge/green-bay-packers-quinn-johnson" target="_blank">Quinn Johnson: Unleashed | Packers Lounge</a></p><p></p><p>About the return man: It's a problem. At PR, Blackmon, when healthy, is a proven commodity. But at KR, we have noone. Would like the coaches to put Dillon in there, as he did it, with success, in college.</p><p></p><p>And about the DBs, individually, they did well. Underwood played very well. Lee did ok. Martin played well. In preseason, you evaluate individuals, and not the team.</p><p></p><p>------------</p><p></p><p>Oh, one more thing about the Cleveland game: They gameplanned. It's not that they didn't play vanilla, THEY SPECIFICALLY GAMEPLANNED AGAINST US. Starting with quick throws from bunch formations? They knew it was our weakness and they gameplanned. They needed the morale boost. We know what we have. So take everything with a grain of salt.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackersRS, post: 289482, member: 1429"] ST: Browns were #1 ST last year, we #31. It was supposed to struggle. Add the fact that we didn't use a cohesive ST unit, rather we put every 80-man player out there... The coaches weren't trying to get production out of ST, rather see which guys played well. DL: really not a problem. The 3 you mentioned are very good, and Neal was VERY good in that game. He looks like a beast. Pass D: The problem was that the DBs were giving too much cushion to the receivers. Commenters at cheeseheadtv.com made some very good points: 1) Tackling. The Packers have been stressing tackling this offseason. Playing with a cushion could be a way to test that. 2) Communication. They could be playing like this so that Burnett gets more time to get used to calling plays. 3) Injuries. They also could be playing off the receivers to lessen the risk of injuries. Now, they played the same way last year, and it drove me mad. But IMHO you have to consider those possibilities before jumping to any conclusions. About the short yardage: [URL="http://cheeseheadtv.com/lounge/green-bay-packers-quinn-johnson"]Quinn Johnson: Unleashed | Packers Lounge[/URL] About the return man: It's a problem. At PR, Blackmon, when healthy, is a proven commodity. But at KR, we have noone. Would like the coaches to put Dillon in there, as he did it, with success, in college. And about the DBs, individually, they did well. Underwood played very well. Lee did ok. Martin played well. In preseason, you evaluate individuals, and not the team. ------------ Oh, one more thing about the Cleveland game: They gameplanned. It's not that they didn't play vanilla, THEY SPECIFICALLY GAMEPLANNED AGAINST US. Starting with quick throws from bunch formations? They knew it was our weakness and they gameplanned. They needed the morale boost. We know what we have. So take everything with a grain of salt. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
mradtke66
kf323
Pkrjones
Latest posts
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
51 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 5:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Schultz
Today at 1:59 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 10:55 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Bad & The Ugly of the 2010 Packers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
