Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 545028">If he was healthy and in shape for training camp somebody else will sign him for meaningfully more than the puny vet minimum of $715,000.  We don't get a risk-free option here.Even if an incentive-based contract is contemplated, some judgement on the likelihood of Jolly's ability to play needs to be made before the draft.  Do we go higher in the draft for Jolly's replacement because he's still seriously in doubt for 2014 or do we merely hedge our bets and go lower in the draft for a base D-Lineman because we like Jolly's odds."Dunno" means we'll need to draft higher if he's not already replaced in free agency.  And I sure hope it's ain't Raji doing the replacing.</blockquote>

Total: 298 (members: 1, guests: 297)