Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 2012 Packer Season Is OVER!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shawnsta3" data-source="post: 462301" data-attributes="member: 5065"><p>Copied this off another forum. Feel this guy hits spot-on.</p><p></p><p>Some thoughts:</p><p></p><p>1. This was actually better than the 30-20 loss I predicted, so that's something.</p><p></p><p>2. The defense is the same as the offense: One great player, a few good ones, and some stiffs who wouldn't start for most teams.</p><p></p><p>3. The O-Line and D-Line were equally horrific, as expected.</p><p></p><p>4. Pickett-Raji-Wilson were manhandled like baby cubs. Most teams would be desperately seeking an upgrade for punchless Raji, while we're talking extension--egad.</p><p></p><p>5. The coverage was very, very weak. Outside of Raji on run plays, I see few guys falling back as quickly as our corners. They're giving cushion because they're afraid to get burned, which is probably wise.</p><p></p><p>6. Matthews is sensational, of course, and Hawk was surprisingly good with 14 tackles. Smith was active, but just too small. On a good defense, Matthews would lead the league in sacks.</p><p></p><p>7. This O-Line absolutely cannot run block, and that leaves Aaron in terrible situations. I pity the man--as much as I can any superstar. We've been far too excited about a below average blocking unit.</p><p></p><p>8. Kuhn might well be the worst lead-blocking fullback in the NFL--so bad, that we've given up using him as such. Good decision. Of course, we don't use him running or catching either, so . . . . what's his position, anyway? Holder? Fan favorite?</p><p></p><p>9. Our wideouts had a tough time getting separation, since we lack a stud like Johnson, Fitzgerald, etc. Just a lot of #2's, with no legit #1. They're definately good enough if you have a running game, and Aaron will get production with anyone, but they need a killer.</p><p></p><p>I'll get hammered as usual, so I won't even bother responding.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shawnsta3, post: 462301, member: 5065"] Copied this off another forum. Feel this guy hits spot-on. Some thoughts: 1. This was actually better than the 30-20 loss I predicted, so that's something. 2. The defense is the same as the offense: One great player, a few good ones, and some stiffs who wouldn't start for most teams. 3. The O-Line and D-Line were equally horrific, as expected. 4. Pickett-Raji-Wilson were manhandled like baby cubs. Most teams would be desperately seeking an upgrade for punchless Raji, while we're talking extension--egad. 5. The coverage was very, very weak. Outside of Raji on run plays, I see few guys falling back as quickly as our corners. They're giving cushion because they're afraid to get burned, which is probably wise. 6. Matthews is sensational, of course, and Hawk was surprisingly good with 14 tackles. Smith was active, but just too small. On a good defense, Matthews would lead the league in sacks. 7. This O-Line absolutely cannot run block, and that leaves Aaron in terrible situations. I pity the man--as much as I can any superstar. We've been far too excited about a below average blocking unit. 8. Kuhn might well be the worst lead-blocking fullback in the NFL--so bad, that we've given up using him as such. Good decision. Of course, we don't use him running or catching either, so . . . . what's his position, anyway? Holder? Fan favorite? 9. Our wideouts had a tough time getting separation, since we lack a stud like Johnson, Fitzgerald, etc. Just a lot of #2's, with no legit #1. They're definately good enough if you have a running game, and Aaron will get production with anyone, but they need a killer. I'll get hammered as usual, so I won't even bother responding. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
Today at 8:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Today at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: milani
Today at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Today at 3:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 2012 Packer Season Is OVER!!!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
