Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Teddy Ginn Jr
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 279566" data-attributes="member: 1429"><p>First of all, he didn't say that "if a player hasn't been on a superbowl winning team then if he was on another team it would make no difference." That wasn't his reasoning AT ALL.</p><p></p><p>His reasoning was that Moss would be an offensive weapon, and it wasn't that what costed us. Not only that, but he couldn't possibly have played better than he did in 07, and even that didn't net him a ring.</p><p></p><p>And his reasoning is pretty strong. I have a really hard time grasping that Moss would be the difference-maker for us in that NFCC game. It wasn't Driver's fault that Favre threw the way he did. But Favre didn't cover Burress all game, and didn't fail to recover a muffed punt...</p><p></p><p>OF course, there IS the possibility that he could've altered the result of that season. That he, with Jennings and Driver, would have made life much easier for Favre, and somebody should be open almost all the time, preventing him from doing what he did...</p><p></p><p>But to pinpoint the Moss trade even as ONE reason that we didn't win the SB in 07 is ludicrous in my view...</p><p></p><p>And as an impossible to prove hypothesis, I don't think it's worth to debate any longer. Just my two cents...</p><p></p><p>-</p><p></p><p>Now, back on topic, that was TT's unwillingness to part with picks for players. I really don't mind it AT ALL. What drives me nuts about him is tendency to always put the financial side of the business above the football side, when it comes to FAs. And I'm not talking about Julius Peppers. Hunter Smith should be a Packer, if TT were to agree to a multi-year deal instead of his one-year he intended. The greatest punter in the league? No. But we wouldn't be talking about the necessity of getting one.</p><p></p><p>If there's no bargain or no player that will really fix our woes, TT always chooses the cheaper one from the best one. Why get Chris McCalister, when you can get a cheaper Josh Bell? And so on and so forth...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackersRS, post: 279566, member: 1429"] First of all, he didn't say that "if a player hasn't been on a superbowl winning team then if he was on another team it would make no difference." That wasn't his reasoning AT ALL. His reasoning was that Moss would be an offensive weapon, and it wasn't that what costed us. Not only that, but he couldn't possibly have played better than he did in 07, and even that didn't net him a ring. And his reasoning is pretty strong. I have a really hard time grasping that Moss would be the difference-maker for us in that NFCC game. It wasn't Driver's fault that Favre threw the way he did. But Favre didn't cover Burress all game, and didn't fail to recover a muffed punt... OF course, there IS the possibility that he could've altered the result of that season. That he, with Jennings and Driver, would have made life much easier for Favre, and somebody should be open almost all the time, preventing him from doing what he did... But to pinpoint the Moss trade even as ONE reason that we didn't win the SB in 07 is ludicrous in my view... And as an impossible to prove hypothesis, I don't think it's worth to debate any longer. Just my two cents... - Now, back on topic, that was TT's unwillingness to part with picks for players. I really don't mind it AT ALL. What drives me nuts about him is tendency to always put the financial side of the business above the football side, when it comes to FAs. And I'm not talking about Julius Peppers. Hunter Smith should be a Packer, if TT were to agree to a multi-year deal instead of his one-year he intended. The greatest punter in the league? No. But we wouldn't be talking about the necessity of getting one. If there's no bargain or no player that will really fix our woes, TT always chooses the cheaper one from the best one. Why get Chris McCalister, when you can get a cheaper Josh Bell? And so on and so forth... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Today at 8:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 6:14 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: milani
Today at 5:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 3:06 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: mradtke66
Today at 2:30 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Teddy Ginn Jr
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
