Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Ted Thompsons five worst moves as GM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 653713" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>While I agree in part, I don't agree that "not signing any guarantees not getting an impact player". Since by not signing someone (a FA) you are a.) able to use money on your current roster of potential free agents and b.) using the saved roster spot for another player....either who could become an impact player.</p><p></p><p>For example. This year we could sign Forte, who could be or may not be an impact player. Or we could resign Starks, who also, may or may not be an impact player. Doing one or the other does not guarantee anything. Or take that scenario one step further. We could let Starks go, not sign Forte and hope Crockett becomes the impact player at #2 we need. This move also frees up a roster spot as well as more money for potentially another impact player.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 653713, member: 7261"] While I agree in part, I don't agree that "not signing any guarantees not getting an impact player". Since by not signing someone (a FA) you are a.) able to use money on your current roster of potential free agents and b.) using the saved roster spot for another player....either who could become an impact player. For example. This year we could sign Forte, who could be or may not be an impact player. Or we could resign Starks, who also, may or may not be an impact player. Doing one or the other does not guarantee anything. Or take that scenario one step further. We could let Starks go, not sign Forte and hope Crockett becomes the impact player at #2 we need. This move also frees up a roster spot as well as more money for potentially another impact player. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Magooch
Latest posts
First Round Pick #23 - Matthew Golden WR - Texas
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
2 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2025 NFL Schedule Release
Latest: Calebs Revenge
25 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Isaiah Simmons is COMING
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 7:48 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC North Predictions
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 6:12 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Da Bears new head coach!!!!!
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 4:42 PM
NFL Discussions
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Ted Thompsons five worst moves as GM
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top