Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 653693" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>I understand the beef some have with TT and his hesitation in the FA market, I am one of them.  But I am also aware that signing more FA's doesn't guarantee anything.  So while its easy to say "If he just signs this guy or that guy, the Packers will win the Super Bowl", but will they?  There are no guarantees, except the money you promise that FA.  The one thing I keep going back to when I evaluate TT is the Packers record in the last 10 years under his guidance and the state of the current team while measuring this against the other 31 teams.  In the last 10 year, The Packers have the best record in the NFC with 104 wins (Seahawks are the closest to that with 101).  8 out of 10 years in the playoffs, 3 times in the NFCC, 1 SB win (Giants are the only team with more then 1).  So if you are only grading TT on the # of FA's he signs and the # of SB wins he has, your grading system is a bit skewed IMO.  I also don't buy into the argument that TT is only successful because of Rodgers (who TT drafted).  Look at the team this year, Rodgers played the full year.  The Packers have been successful thanks in large part to Rodgers, but also thanks to the team that TT has assembled around him.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Total: 100 (members: 2, guests: 98)