Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="rmontro" data-source="post: 748896" data-attributes="member: 12340">Obviously we're not going to be as good without Rodgers.  But I mean we didn't even score a point today.  Hundley has been something of a disappointment, but I'm more bothered by the rest of the team.  The Vikings are on their third quarterback and they're 8-2.  What Rodgers absence has done is exposed the roster, and that's on Ted.  Some teams will collapse when their #1 quarterback goes down, some will thrive (maybe the replacement thrives, like Brady), and some will tread water well enough until the starter comes back.  The team should be strong enough to withstand one injury, even if it is Rodgers.  And what bugs me most about this is not that we're losing this season, it's that when Rodgers IS here, he isn't being surrounded by the talent that he could be.  Thompson's reputation as some sort of genius is taking a serious hit right now, because the roster he has built around Rodgers is not that impressive.</blockquote>

Total: 987 (members: 1, guests: 986)