Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PackerfaninCarolina" data-source="post: 709838" data-attributes="member: 9364">I think this is the bigger issue right here.  We've all come to know Rodgers in post-2010 and following years form as the QB he is today, but we forget how much work it took to get him there.  If one went back and watched all through the 2005, 2006 and partially 2007 preseasons when he got most of his early action, woulda been hard to peg him as the future of Green Bay.Back to the topic at hand, I don't really see how picking Rodgers in whatever way it was done, whether by happenstance or a planned move really affects Thompson's legacy.  It's his pick any way you dice it up.But where I think most of us are starting to get irritated with is certain posters seem to be going nuts with hypotheticals, many of which prove nothing and are pretty heavily unsubstantiated.  I mean we could go on and on with hypotheticals favoring us, many of which had they come true would vindicate Dom Capers in a heartbeat.  But you just can't because they didn't happen.  I mean ... ohhh jeez just don't tell me you're living in the real world of the state of the Packers when you gotta use hypotheticals to prop up other teams just to make a point, just don't.</blockquote>

Total: 756 (members: 2, guests: 754)