Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 708447" data-attributes="member: 7261">I wasn't arguing that TT didn't try and solve either position, I was arguing that the "moves" he made gravitated towards one dimensional....his own players or cheap.The "holes" I was referring to at RB were created when TT decided Lacy and Starks were adequate to begin the season.  Remember, Monty wasn't a known commodity or even in the discussion at that time.  So right out of the gate, TT is saying "these 2 are enough, if need be....we go to Brandon Burks....wait....Jhurell Pressley....wait......Don Jackson.....no....Kniles Davis....wait..Christian Michael"  Had Monty not done what he did and I give MM or one of the coaches credit for him, not TT, the Packer running game would have been almost non-existent after Lacy went down.So yes, TT made some "moves" to try and cover his *** at RB, but again his moves were 5 cheap players, that were either his own PS guys or basically free.  IMO, starting the season with only Lacy and Starks at RB, was a poor decision right out of the gate and pretty much everything that followed mimicked what he did with the CB position.Think Belichick would have done the same with both positions?</blockquote>

Total: 1,103 (members: 1, guests: 1,102)