Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 987731" data-attributes="member: 17987">Unless the team is just desperate to get his contract off the books ASAP, it feels like one of those situations where his value to the Packers is probably still greater than his value to another interested team...By that I mean...a "Good deal" (in terms of compensation) for an interested team would probably be a bad deal for us. It would likely present more value for us to simply keep him as he's still a very good player. Like I said, unless we are desperate to start clearing space.Similarly a "good deal" for us in terms of compensation probably isn't a terribly attractive one for another team; many may be inclined to find a cheaper option, go to the draft, or pay up a bit more for a more favorable situation (age/contract status/health/etc). Basically the short of it is that it's hard for me to see a Bakh trade that's a clear-cut win for all parties.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,101 (members: 0, guests: 1,101)