Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Tearing it Down
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 987731" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>Unless the team is just desperate to get his contract off the books ASAP, it feels like one of those situations where his value to the Packers is probably still greater than his value to another interested team...</p><p></p><p>By that I mean...a "Good deal" (in terms of compensation) for an interested team would probably be a bad deal for us. It would likely present more value for us to simply keep him as he's still a very good player. Like I said, unless we are desperate to start clearing space.</p><p>Similarly a "good deal" for us in terms of compensation probably isn't a terribly attractive one for another team; many may be inclined to find a cheaper option, go to the draft, or pay up a bit more for a more favorable situation (age/contract status/health/etc). </p><p></p><p>Basically the short of it is that it's hard for me to see a Bakh trade that's a clear-cut win for all parties.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 987731, member: 17987"] Unless the team is just desperate to get his contract off the books ASAP, it feels like one of those situations where his value to the Packers is probably still greater than his value to another interested team... By that I mean...a "Good deal" (in terms of compensation) for an interested team would probably be a bad deal for us. It would likely present more value for us to simply keep him as he's still a very good player. Like I said, unless we are desperate to start clearing space. Similarly a "good deal" for us in terms of compensation probably isn't a terribly attractive one for another team; many may be inclined to find a cheaper option, go to the draft, or pay up a bit more for a more favorable situation (age/contract status/health/etc). Basically the short of it is that it's hard for me to see a Bakh trade that's a clear-cut win for all parties. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Free Agency Thread
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 12:20 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers OL Types
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 8:16 PM
Draft Talk
2024 Clusters
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 7:45 PM
Draft Talk
Corbin Burnes traded to Orioles.
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 7:34 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Badger buckets 2023-2024
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 5:56 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Tearing it Down
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top