Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Tearing it Down
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 980188"><p>If you want to make a fair comparison to the running game you need to include the one incompletion when targeting Jones as well, resulting in the average yards per attempt going down to 3.75 yards. Once again, that isn't impressive by any means and definitely doesn't justify advocating to suggest an increased number of targets for the running backs.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There's no doubt Rodgers played a bad game vs. the Niners but without the special teams having been a train wreck it would have been good enough to win it. He outplayed Brady in the NFCCG in 2020 but the team lost because of giving up 14 points in a short span before and after halftime. Yet you can't focus on anyone else than Rodgers because they didn't score on three attempts from the 8-yard line. It's actually pretty sad.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As I have mentioned repeatedly I don't think that's true at all. In my opinion the Packers are only some pieces away from being a legit contender as long as Rodgers is around.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree with [USER=17987]@Magooch[/USER] that the Packers have hardly invested a lot of capital on offensive linemen and wide receivers over the past few years. Them re-signing Bakhtiari to a huge deal is the only exception. Other than that they mostly ignored those positions in free agency or early in the draft expecting Rodgers to work magic with the talent he has been surrounded with. </p><p></p><p>While it's nice to spend several day three picks on those positions the probability of either of those working out is small, something you admitted to be true as well.</p><p></p><p>I agree that them trading up to select Watson this season should be considered as a significant move though.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 980188"] If you want to make a fair comparison to the running game you need to include the one incompletion when targeting Jones as well, resulting in the average yards per attempt going down to 3.75 yards. Once again, that isn't impressive by any means and definitely doesn't justify advocating to suggest an increased number of targets for the running backs. There's no doubt Rodgers played a bad game vs. the Niners but without the special teams having been a train wreck it would have been good enough to win it. He outplayed Brady in the NFCCG in 2020 but the team lost because of giving up 14 points in a short span before and after halftime. Yet you can't focus on anyone else than Rodgers because they didn't score on three attempts from the 8-yard line. It's actually pretty sad. As I have mentioned repeatedly I don't think that's true at all. In my opinion the Packers are only some pieces away from being a legit contender as long as Rodgers is around. I agree with [USER=17987]@Magooch[/USER] that the Packers have hardly invested a lot of capital on offensive linemen and wide receivers over the past few years. Them re-signing Bakhtiari to a huge deal is the only exception. Other than that they mostly ignored those positions in free agency or early in the draft expecting Rodgers to work magic with the talent he has been surrounded with. While it's nice to spend several day three picks on those positions the probability of either of those working out is small, something you admitted to be true as well. I agree that them trading up to select Watson this season should be considered as a significant move though. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
DoURant
gopkrs
Schultz
Latest posts
Free Agency Thread
Latest: gopkrs
1 minute ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Backed Into A Corner?
Latest: gopkrs
3 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers for Vice President?
Latest: gopkrs
7 minutes ago
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Prospects you are A LOT higher on than consensus…
Latest: Dantés
37 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Not really that new to the board now...
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 1:18 PM
Introduce Yourself
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Tearing it Down
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top