Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Tearing it Down
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 980163" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>I'm repeating myself but...I don't think I'm the one ignoring that. </p><p></p><p>Keep in mind that your original post itself claimed "<strong>The Packers loaded up for the 2022 season </strong>even more so once Davante chose not to come back...at literally every position except for WR."</p><p></p><p>In 2022 we are 25th in OL spending. The draft capital we spent on all three offensive linemen we drafted in the 2022 draft carried a value equivalent to roughly that of one mid-3rd round pick (approx. pick ~75). And unless I've missed something, we spent precisely $0m on OL in free agency this offseason. </p><p></p><p>I guess maybe we just fundamentally disagree on how to define "loading up" but I would not consider spending 0 in free agency and picks 92, </p><p>140, and 249 in the draft to be "loading up" on a position when it comes to the 2022 season, as initially stated. </p><p></p><p>(Similarly I would not consider replacing Adams, MVS, ESB, etc with one 2nd round pick and 1.85m in free agency on a single WR to be "loading up" at that position either, but you already said previously that we didn't load up at WR... so you are arguing with yourself at this point on that one, lol)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 980163, member: 17987"] I'm repeating myself but...I don't think I'm the one ignoring that. Keep in mind that your original post itself claimed[B] [/B]"[B]The Packers loaded up for the 2022 season [/B]even more so once Davante chose not to come back...at literally every position except for WR." In 2022 we are 25th in OL spending. The draft capital we spent on all three offensive linemen we drafted in the 2022 draft carried a value equivalent to roughly that of one mid-3rd round pick (approx. pick ~75). And unless I've missed something, we spent precisely $0m on OL in free agency this offseason. I guess maybe we just fundamentally disagree on how to define "loading up" but I would not consider spending 0 in free agency and picks 92, 140, and 249 in the draft to be "loading up" on a position when it comes to the 2022 season, as initially stated. (Similarly I would not consider replacing Adams, MVS, ESB, etc with one 2nd round pick and 1.85m in free agency on a single WR to be "loading up" at that position either, but you already said previously that we didn't load up at WR... so you are arguing with yourself at this point on that one, lol) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
Poppa San
* Team Owner *
Members online
Team Ronny
Pkrjones
tynimiller
Big L
Poppa San
scheeler
shockerx
Latest posts
2024 Draft-- Media Stuff
Latest: tynimiller
5 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: tynimiller
6 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Posting draft picks
Latest: Poppa San
23 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
G
2024 Salary Cap as related to Free Agency
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
28 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
162-0
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Tearing it Down
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top