Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 979270" data-attributes="member: 12283">I continued to talk only about London because we seemed to agree about Pitts. Basically my point is this:LondonPittsZaccheausHodge ByrdIs not gigantically better than:LazardJonesWatsonDoubsCobbThat's what I'm saying. London, as a rookie is probably better than any receiver the Packers currently have, but not by a big margin. Pitts is obviously a superior player to anyone on the Packers and if one wanted to give them the nod because of his presence, I get that. But the rest of their top pass catchers are actually worse than Green Bay's. So the gap isn't large. So what I am saying is that the Falcons' superior offensive performance on the season is decidedly not because of personnel. It's because of execution and commitment to running a scheme. The Packers have more talent on offense, but they've failed at the levels of execution and especially playing within the design of the offense.</blockquote>

Total: 579 (members: 4, guests: 575)