Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1092885" data-attributes="member: 10086">Sure. It’s hard to break it down by every role he plays. The first thing you’ll notice right off the bat is we know 100% he played exclusively ILB in 2014 and it’s not a small sample. Yet he had 8.5 Sacks across 8 games.So we can label him positionally or move him but the reality is you don’t pace 17 Sacks unless you’re still being used heavily as a Pass Rusher. For Clay to rack up 8.5 Sacks, 41 Tackles at what I’d call a Probowl alternate 22% TFL rate is nothing short of “highly productive”.2015 wasn’t as exceptional as a wonderful 2014. Yet Clay was not bad. That’s just not true. Also taking 1 of 2 games out of context just displays an axe to grind. No player is ever judged on 1 sub par performance and you and I both know that. We similarly can’t take his best game and ignore his full body of work. We have to at minimum look at his 2014-2015 campaign to grade him. The guy didn’t even play ILB and he still was very effective</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 595 (members: 0, guests: 595)