Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1092682" data-attributes="member: 10086">Good stuff.I see our guys as that solid CB2 to a very good CB3 ranked perimeter options. That’s nothing hateful, but it’s not wise expecting them to be true difference makers (not suggesting you said that just making a remark)IMO you’d like to ideally have 1 boundary CB in solid footing, Top 20 contention. It would be preferred to have a Top 10 CB (calling JA prime) but they don’t grow on trees either. I also think GB is set in the Slot.This 2026 draft is what I’d call above average at the CB position. It’s got plenty of Day 1 types too and that infers it’s not going to be short supply mixed high demand starting from our first pick. The Packers really need a pair of CB’s imo. I say that because BOTH our starters are in contract years + we already need better depth.My plan would be to draft 1 CB from RD2-5. I have the need in RD3-4 area but that could change in FA. If we go the FA route then I’d drop the need at CB to RD5-7</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,069 (members: 0, guests: 1,069)