Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1092129" data-attributes="member: 17987">Yeah, I hear ya....my trouble is just that it feels like we kind of pigeon-hole ourselves. Like, it's one thing to say "We want our KR to be able to also play WR" and that's fine...But it's another thing to say "We want our KR to be able to also play WR, and to be able to play WR for us, you need to be at least 5'10" and 190lbs" because in that way you're effectively saying that that's also the minimum size requirement for our KR/PR by extension. So I don't have any beef with trying to field guys who offer a bit more "roster utility" but like [USER=9744]@Sanguine camper[/USER] was saying it might serve us well to loosen that "threshold" a bit in this particular circumstance and be ok with having a KR/PR who *can* play WR even if they're a bit below our typically desired size/athleticism thresholds</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,032 (members: 0, guests: 1,032)