Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="NYPacker" data-source="post: 285338" data-attributes="member: 1831">The only reason why I even suggested Samuel and continue to do so is because I'm trying to look at a FA and trades through TT's eyes. Whenever TT wants to get a high quality player it's because they can contribute to your team for the long term. He doesn't want to spend the money on a guy who comes in and contributes for a season or 2, but can be a starter till the day they retire; hence Bigby, Colledge, T Will still unsigned.Now going back to Samuel's case, I believe he not only fits a need this year but as I see it be a contributor to this defense for a long time. As RS mentioned it you need guys that fit your scheme and I think Samuel does, he was a better fit in NE's 3-4 than Philly's 4-3 bump'n run. With Al Harris & Woodson near retirement, T. Will being a good No. 2, where do you find a long term No. 1 CB? Underwood, Lee are average at best even with their potential. We can certainly find one in the draft, but we still don't know as of yet.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,023 (members: 0, guests: 1,023)