Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="agopackgo4" data-source="post: 17640" data-attributes="member: 265"><p>Im sorry but I have a question. Why did you just pass over and not adress what I said about the 96-97 packers? It shows that you do not need a great running game. Hey I will not deny when Green holds onto the football, he is great. But the Bad isnt worth the good with Green. If It was up to me sense everyone thinks that Green is so good, why do we not trade him and get someone on defense and get just a average running back? I think that there was a reason that Seattle gave up on Green. If it was up to me Green would never see the field in a packer uniform again. Dont get me wrong I am not trying to be mean or anything to you or anyone else including Green. But we just have a difference in opinions. We can disagree that is fine. I just do not think that Green is a top notch running back. And I would rather have someone else I dont care who but someone else in there other than green.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Total: 621 (members: 2, guests: 619)