Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Tactics under Matt LeFleur
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackerfaninCarolina" data-source="post: 898277" data-attributes="member: 9364"><p>Well, you can dice the decision to kick the FG there any way you want.</p><p></p><p>If it was a 2 possession game where you would need 9 or 10 or something, I might have been a little more forgiving of it. But in that situation, chances are also pretty likely we go for an onside kick too.</p><p></p><p>So ... it's also true we had all 3 timeouts plus 2mw left, but you're still asking quite a bit to hope the D produces a 3 and out, especially after that Gronk screen pass play. I just feel, since you need the TD anyway, and if you fail you'll want good field position, I'd have just gone for it, and if the defense did manage to hold the offense could get it back with better field position potentially.</p><p></p><p>And if we did score the TD on 4th down and convert 2 points, a not called King holding play would have given us the chance to go down and kick a game winning FG. Or even with that penalty, we might still be able to keep them out of FG range, or potentially ice Succop.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackerfaninCarolina, post: 898277, member: 9364"] Well, you can dice the decision to kick the FG there any way you want. If it was a 2 possession game where you would need 9 or 10 or something, I might have been a little more forgiving of it. But in that situation, chances are also pretty likely we go for an onside kick too. So ... it's also true we had all 3 timeouts plus 2mw left, but you're still asking quite a bit to hope the D produces a 3 and out, especially after that Gronk screen pass play. I just feel, since you need the TD anyway, and if you fail you'll want good field position, I'd have just gone for it, and if the defense did manage to hold the offense could get it back with better field position potentially. And if we did score the TD on 4th down and convert 2 points, a not called King holding play would have given us the chance to go down and kick a game winning FG. Or even with that penalty, we might still be able to keep them out of FG range, or potentially ice Succop. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Today at 7:06 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 5:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Schultz
Today at 1:59 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 10:55 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Tactics under Matt LeFleur
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top