Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 730154" data-attributes="member: 7261">Since the two kind of go hand in hand, it isn't crazy, especially if you view what the defense did/didn't do last year.  However, keep in mind that if you are grading the defense purely on "sacks", last year the Packers had 40, which ranked 6th in the NFL.Aaron Rodgers has proved time and again, if he can get enough time, he will find someone open, no matter who is covering the receivers.  However, if the coverage is tight and the pass rush is quick, even the great AR throws the ball away.  While I would love a beast of a pass rush, which would no doubt help to improve the stats of the secondary, you still need to have guys that can cover quick slants/routes and be assignment sure, we didn't have that last year, despite the 40 sacks.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,330 (members: 0, guests: 1,330)