Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AmishMafia" data-source="post: 781104" data-attributes="member: 2846">I think MM had 100% control over coaches underneath him. I think most, if not all, coaches do. Personally, I cant see why anyone, worth a ****, would become a HC without being given that authority. Your livelihood, reputation, and legacy hang in the balance. It's up to you to establish a staff you can work with and have the same philosophy.Sure TT could approach MM and suggest a change, but it maybe a decision that TT would have to fire MM as well to get rid of Capers. I think MM is worth keeping. I dont know why MM held onto Capers as long as he did. That has been his biggest error as a HC.Some posters, not talking about you, dont have a clue what no talent or poor coaching looks like. I am reasonably sure that TT was demoted due to health reasons and not because of performance. Otherwise, he would have been fired completely.The new structure is probably the demand by MM. It's not fair to the HC to hire a new GM who can in turn fire the HC. And maybe he agreed to fire Capers under the condition of the new structure? I doubt it, but it is still possible.</blockquote>

Total: 83 (members: 2, guests: 81)