Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Studs n duds Oakland
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AmishMafia" data-source="post: 848890" data-attributes="member: 2846"><p>Rodgers played extemely well. He hasn't performed at this level for a full game in several years. Of course well thrown balls make a WRs job easier, so he makes them look better. Likewise, his poor passing over the first games made them look bad. Yes, they dropped a bunch that should have been caught</p><p> There were plenty though that were caught ànd were poor throws as well.</p><p></p><p>I don't think this game was an abberattion. I think the offense will be more effective going forward. I think AR is finally comfortable with the offense and his WRs. I think the big turning point was Lazard against the Lions. Coming up big and expressing confidence in himself was a moment for Rodgers. He definitely started slinging it àgain with great results.</p><p></p><p>My point is, we didn't need to add WRs to this team as many suggested to have an effective passing game.</p><p></p><p>I think it was more of a matter of not running faster than he needed to.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AmishMafia, post: 848890, member: 2846"] Rodgers played extemely well. He hasn't performed at this level for a full game in several years. Of course well thrown balls make a WRs job easier, so he makes them look better. Likewise, his poor passing over the first games made them look bad. Yes, they dropped a bunch that should have been caught There were plenty though that were caught ànd were poor throws as well. I don't think this game was an abberattion. I think the offense will be more effective going forward. I think AR is finally comfortable with the offense and his WRs. I think the big turning point was Lazard against the Lions. Coming up big and expressing confidence in himself was a moment for Rodgers. He definitely started slinging it àgain with great results. My point is, we didn't need to add WRs to this team as many suggested to have an effective passing game. I think it was more of a matter of not running faster than he needed to. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
milani
gopkrs
rmontro
Latest posts
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: milani
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: gopkrs
5 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
14 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 255 (compensatory): Kalen King, CB
Latest: Dantés
Yesterday at 10:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 6, pick 202: Travis Glover, OT
Latest: Dantés
Yesterday at 10:35 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Studs n duds Oakland
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top