Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Studs n duds Bear meat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="adambr2" data-source="post: 1084922" data-attributes="member: 7277"><p>The game has changed since Joe Gibbs was coaching. Kickers are deadly accurate from 55+ regularly and starting field position is closer to the 35 yard line rather than the 20. Where teams would once have to go 50 yards to get into FG position, they now need to only go 25.</p><p></p><p>This mentality disregards the value of field position. When you take the points on 4th and goal from the 1, you get 3 but you lose the 34 yards of field position. </p><p></p><p>When you go for 4th and 1, your upside is 7 and your downside is 0 but still comes with the silver lining of your opponent backed way up to their goalline. That field position matters, it has value.</p><p></p><p>I find that the “we should’ve took the points” argument only seems to come up when it fits the narrative. We “took the points” repeatedly against Denver last week and traded 7 for 3 all day and that didn’t work. No one brought it up then.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="adambr2, post: 1084922, member: 7277"] The game has changed since Joe Gibbs was coaching. Kickers are deadly accurate from 55+ regularly and starting field position is closer to the 35 yard line rather than the 20. Where teams would once have to go 50 yards to get into FG position, they now need to only go 25. This mentality disregards the value of field position. When you take the points on 4th and goal from the 1, you get 3 but you lose the 34 yards of field position. When you go for 4th and 1, your upside is 7 and your downside is 0 but still comes with the silver lining of your opponent backed way up to their goalline. That field position matters, it has value. I find that the “we should’ve took the points” argument only seems to come up when it fits the narrative. We “took the points” repeatedly against Denver last week and traded 7 for 3 all day and that didn’t work. No one brought it up then. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Firethorn1001
Heyjoe4
Latest posts
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
12 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Heyjoe4
15 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 8:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Studs n duds Bear meat
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top