Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Stacking Up the NFC North
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 776728" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>How do we know that?</p><p></p><p>And yes, it is common that high draft picks are slotted into starting roles out of the gate. Mid to late round rookies typically have to do some work to break in. Take Jordan Howard, for instance. His rookie season, he was playing behind Jeremy Langford for the first three games. In time, it proved that he was far and away the best back on the team, and yet his draft/rookie status kept him out of the lineup. </p><p></p><p>It's funny to me that the primary argument for why Cook is better is that he started right away. If he was "head and shoulders" better as [USER=655]@Raptorman[/USER] stated, shouldn't there be an easy case to be made based on actual production?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 776728, member: 12283"] How do we know that? And yes, it is common that high draft picks are slotted into starting roles out of the gate. Mid to late round rookies typically have to do some work to break in. Take Jordan Howard, for instance. His rookie season, he was playing behind Jeremy Langford for the first three games. In time, it proved that he was far and away the best back on the team, and yet his draft/rookie status kept him out of the lineup. It's funny to me that the primary argument for why Cook is better is that he started right away. If he was "head and shoulders" better as [USER=655]@Raptorman[/USER] stated, shouldn't there be an easy case to be made based on actual production? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
Today at 9:17 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:08 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 7:59 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 7:44 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 7:40 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Stacking Up the NFC North
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top