Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 715549" data-attributes="member: 7261">I have no clue what you are saying/asking in relation to my point. Why would you play back-ups in favor of better healthy players?What I am saying is, players from the bottom 25% (arbitrary #) of your roster could and have been called on to get starting snaps due to injuries during the season.  When that 25% is predominantly made up of guys with little or no NFL experience, you are taking a big gamble.  Much more than the gamble of having a vet backing up that position or actually finding that vet elsewhere at the time of the need.  TT and the Packers have been putting too much reliance on guys with little or no experience IMO and using the bottom portion of the 52 man roster like an extended PS.</blockquote>

Total: 52 (members: 3, guests: 49)