Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
'Splain this one Lucy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 956978" data-attributes="member: 6578"><p>You actually can, and it is to illustrate the efficiency of a receiver. Adams does more with his targets than a TON of WRs. It helps illustrate yet again why Adams is a higher level WR in his efficiency with targets. As with any statistical reflections or projection - it isn't a perfect science of course, however it is purely an exercise of comparison and shouldn't be overthought too much or also shouldn't be written off.</p><p></p><p>The amount of targets a WR gets is of course a product of multiple different things...a downfield type weapon could see a lower amount of targets if a team has terrible line play, a QB without a deep arm, a WR's inability to create space or he could be a teams' 4th/5th or even 6th option. A wide range of items can impact a players target number....but measuring their efficiency when targeted is a metric I and many appreciate - it is one way folks can see separation of WRs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tynimiller, post: 956978, member: 6578"] You actually can, and it is to illustrate the efficiency of a receiver. Adams does more with his targets than a TON of WRs. It helps illustrate yet again why Adams is a higher level WR in his efficiency with targets. As with any statistical reflections or projection - it isn't a perfect science of course, however it is purely an exercise of comparison and shouldn't be overthought too much or also shouldn't be written off. The amount of targets a WR gets is of course a product of multiple different things...a downfield type weapon could see a lower amount of targets if a team has terrible line play, a QB without a deep arm, a WR's inability to create space or he could be a teams' 4th/5th or even 6th option. A wide range of items can impact a players target number....but measuring their efficiency when targeted is a metric I and many appreciate - it is one way folks can see separation of WRs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
tynimiller
mradtke66
Latest posts
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Curly Calhoun
33 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 4, pick 111: Evan Williams, S, Oregon
Latest: tynimiller
34 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: milani
Today at 6:54 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Curly Calhoun
Yesterday at 5:37 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 4:33 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
'Splain this one Lucy?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top