Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="FanOfTheGame" data-source="post: 255392" data-attributes="member: 1798">But the question is whether you would want Favre for the next two years or Rodgers for the next ten.  Stating that any rational person would pick Favre seems to just be answering who you would rather have as your qb now, without consideration to the future which is what the question is getting at. Sure there might be other franchise caliber QBs coming out of college in the next half decade, but what are the chances that GB would get them?  Especially if Favre is the QB and the Packers had two good or great seasons.  And if GB did get one of those quarterbacks out of college that quarterback wouldn't likely be ready to start immediately.   I agree that you don't get rid of a star QB coming off of a 13-3 season if you think you have a valid shot at the SB.  But I'm thinking that with Favre, although the Packers could make the playoffs, with this team I don't see them getting to the SB. I disagree with the other posters who think it would have been impossible to have Favre and retain Rodgers.  I guess it doesn't really matter though because the question makes it an either/or and implies that having both was not possible.  Under those circumstances I would prefer to have Rodgers for the next 10 years.</blockquote>

Total: 811 (members: 1, guests: 810)