Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="FanOfTheGame" data-source="post: 255367" data-attributes="member: 1798">Here's my take on it:  I would rather have Favre for the next 2 years and Rodgers for the next ten.  I agree with Quientus that Thompson could have worked something out to keep Rodgers.  It was very possible to have it both ways.  I'm not saying Favre would be making a difference with this team right now, I don't know, but that's not what matters in my mind.  What matters is that Favre would not be playing for the Vikings right now and they would not be 7-1.  Further, we would not be 4-3.  We would probably be 6-1 and leading the division.  We likely would have won the two games against the Vikings.  Not because we had Favre, but because the Vikings wouldn't have Favre.  The Vikings have an overall better team right now, but they wouldn't be where they are with Jackson or Rosenfels.  I don't see it as who is a better quarterback between Favre and Rodgers.  I see it as who is a better quarterback between Favre and Jackson/Rosenfels.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,011 (members: 0, guests: 1,011)