Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
So does this years 1 and 2 picks mean 2015 was a waste?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 722716" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>It was a waste long before this draft!</p><p>J/k! (I think?)</p><p> Seriously though, I think it's kinda half and half, meaning either Randall or Rollins steps up while the other regresses.</p><p>With some luck, King could develop and Be a starter by year's end if either veteran doesn't improve markedly his 3rd season. My guess is that Randall will lift his game some this year barring another nagging injury.</p><p>I might add that.. I think it was brilliant getting a tall guy like King without sacrificing athleticism. These WRs are not getting any shorter. A 6'3+ Wideout has a clear advantage over a 5'10 1/2" DB and this will eventually alleviate several matchup nightmares.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 722716, member: 10086"] It was a waste long before this draft! J/k! (I think?) Seriously though, I think it's kinda half and half, meaning either Randall or Rollins steps up while the other regresses. With some luck, King could develop and Be a starter by year's end if either veteran doesn't improve markedly his 3rd season. My guess is that Randall will lift his game some this year barring another nagging injury. I might add that.. I think it was brilliant getting a tall guy like King without sacrificing athleticism. These WRs are not getting any shorter. A 6'3+ Wideout has a clear advantage over a 5'10 1/2" DB and this will eventually alleviate several matchup nightmares. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Calebs Revenge
Green_Bay_Packers
Pkrjones
Azpackfan4
Latest posts
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 8:27 AM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:24 AM
College Sports
Kentucky Derby Day!
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 8:12 AM
All Other Sports
H
29th pick.. Eric stokes db
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:23 AM
Draft Talk
H
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:19 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
So does this years 1 and 2 picks mean 2015 was a waste?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top